Use case assessment
Which processes genuinely lend themselves to AI, with estimates of impact, risk and effort. And which to leave alone.
We help you decide what's worth doing with AI, what isn't, and in what order. Then, if it makes sense, we build it: we're the same people who write the code, so the advice has to survive contact with reality.
Not every situation needs a consultant. These do, because the cost of the wrong decision is high.
We don't advise on AI for marketing or content generation: our ground is systems that enter operational processes.
Every consulting engagement closes with concrete documents, written to be read by management and used by engineers.
Which processes genuinely lend themselves to AI, with estimates of impact, risk and effort. And which to leave alone.
Which approach and which models fit your case, including the alternatives we ruled out and why.
What to buy and what to build, accounting for running costs, data constraints and vendor lock-in.
If an AI system is already in place: what works, what doesn't, what costs more than it should, and which fixes pay back fastest.
A sequence of steps with dependencies and checkpoints, sized for the people you actually have.
We prefer few steps with clear outcomes over a months-long analysis project.
We establish objectives, constraints and what has already been tried. Often this is where it emerges that the real problem differs from the stated one.
We examine your data, systems and existing integrations, and test feasibility in practice rather than in theory.
We present the options with costs, risks and timelines, plus an explicit recommendation. We don't leave the whole choice on your desk.
If the path is clear we build it; if a significant doubt remains, we settle it with a targeted proof of concept.
We only advise on what we have built and maintained in production.
When a commercial model makes sense, when an open one does, when fine-tuning is justified and when good prompt design is enough.
How to make company knowledge reliably queryable, with source citation and error control.
Where system autonomy genuinely pays off, and where it introduces risks not worth taking.
Many problems are better solved by a traditional predictive model than an LLM. Knowing which is half the work.
Quality, accessibility and structure of data: the variable that determines project outcomes more than any other.
GDPR and the EU AI Act translated into concrete architectural choices, not a document to file away.
Different formats depending on whether you need to decide, to verify or to build.
An analysis with a defined subject and question, closing with written recommendations and a roadmap.
When you need a well-founded decision, quickly.
A regular presence alongside your team: reviewing decisions, weighing vendors, unblocking technical problems as they surface.
When the internal team exists but lacks specific experience.
The consulting continues into delivery with the same people: whoever proposed the solution also answers for how it behaves.
When the path is clear and you need someone to walk it.
Cost depends on scope: the depth of the analysis, the number of systems involved, and the duration of the support. That's why we don't publish rate cards — we define the scope on the first call and the proposal arrives with explicit numbers.
Agencies mostly work on marketing and content produced with third-party tools. We design and write software that enters operational processes and integrates with business systems. They're two different trades: if your need is the former, an agency suits you better.
No, and we hold no reseller agreements. The choice between commercial and open models, cloud and on-premise, is made case by case. When an off-the-shelf product is the right answer we say so, even though it means less development work for us.
Yes, we're asked this often. We assess architecture, output quality, running costs and compliance, and return a list of interventions ranked by payback. Sometimes the conclusion is that the system is sound and only needs better tuning.
Yes. In that case the consulting also covers how to govern the system over time: what needs oversight, how often, and which skills are worth building internally rather than depending on us.
A scoped assessment typically closes within a few weeks. Ongoing advisory is a periodic collaboration instead, sized to the pace of the decisions your team has to make.
If you're after something more specific, these paths start from a different need.
You don't need to reinvent the company to use AI. We start from a process that costs you hours every week, test it on real data within weeks, and scale only once the numbers justify it.
Sometimes you don't need to hand over a project — you need someone to think with before deciding. A senior engineer who knows your context and is consistently available, without hiring a full-time role.
Most AI projects stop at the demo. The distance between a prototype that works in a meeting and a system that survives daily use is made of integrations, error handling and monitoring — that's the part we do.
Half an hour to frame the problem and work out whether it needs an analysis, a validation, or nothing at all.