Source code and infrastructure
Repositories, configuration and infrastructure definitions. All yours, with no opaque components left in our hands.
Most AI projects stop at the demo. The distance between a prototype that works in a meeting and a system that survives daily use is made of integrations, error handling and monitoring — that's the part we do.
Buying is almost always faster. Building pays off when one of these applies.
If an off-the-shelf product covers 80% of the need, that's usually the better buy — we'll say so even when it means no project for us.
A system is finished when it runs without the people who wrote it. That's the standard we hand over against.
Repositories, configuration and infrastructure definitions. All yours, with no opaque components left in our hands.
Connections to your ERP, databases, internal services and third-party APIs, with error handling and edge cases covered.
Tests and metrics that tell you whether the system still answers well after a change. Without them, every update is a gamble.
Containerisation, repeatable releases and visibility into cost, latency and errors once the system is live.
Technical documentation and sessions with your team, so maintenance can pass to whoever you choose.
Short cycles with something working to look at early, rather than a single delivery at the end.
We define expected behaviour, edge cases, integrations and acceptance criteria. This is the phase that prevents expensive surprises.
We build the main path end to end, so you can actually use it instead of judging it from a description.
Edge cases, performance, running costs and security. This is where a prototype becomes a dependable system.
Go-live, active monitoring and handover. We stay available through the settling-in period.
Areas where we've shipped code into production, not just experiments.
Systems that carry out multi-step tasks using tools and APIs, with guardrails, spend limits and human oversight at the critical points.
Retrieval over documents and knowledge graphs, with source citation and measured answer quality.
Forecasting, classification and anomaly detection: from data preparation to a running model, with retraining planned from the start.
Models running on your own infrastructure or close to the machine, when latency, cost or confidentiality rule out the cloud.
Image and video analysis for quality control, recognition and counting, including on resource-constrained hardware.
Repeatable releases, model versioning, quality monitoring over time and control of inference costs.
The format depends on how well defined the problem is when we start.
When technical feasibility is still uncertain: we test the riskiest assumption before committing to full development.
When the question is "can this be done?".
The project advances through milestones with verifiable deliveries, so you can assess progress and adjust course along the way.
When the system to build is clear.
When your team develops in-house but needs specific expertise: algorithm selection, evaluation design, code review.
When you need technical depth, not extra hands.
We don't publish rate cards: development cost depends on how many integrations are needed, the state of your data, the reliability requirements and the support period after release. We define the scope on the first call and the proposal arrives with numbers per milestone.
Buy, when a product covers the need: it costs less and starts immediately. Build when the process is specific, the data can't leave, or integration with internal systems is the bulk of the work. It's one of the first things we assess, and sometimes the answer is that no project is needed.
Yes. Open models can run on your infrastructure, on-premise or in a private cloud, and in some cases directly on hardware in the field. It changes the cost profile and achievable performance, so it's a decision to take at the start.
Whichever you prefer. We hand over code and documentation so your team can take it on, and run the handover sessions needed. If you'd rather we maintain it, that's a separate support arrangement.
Both, depending on the case. Commercial models are often the fastest and most capable choice; open models win on confidentiality, high-volume costs and vendor independence. We design systems so the model can be swapped without a rewrite.
With an automated evaluation built alongside the system: a set of representative cases and metrics that tell you, after every change, whether quality went up or down. Without it you can't evolve an AI system safely — and it's the first thing missing in projects we inherit.
If you need to work out what to build before building it, start here.
You don't need to reinvent the company to use AI. We start from a process that costs you hours every week, test it on real data within weeks, and scale only once the numbers justify it.
We help you decide what's worth doing with AI, what isn't, and in what order. Then, if it makes sense, we build it: we're the same people who write the code, so the advice has to survive contact with reality.
Sometimes you don't need to hand over a project — you need someone to think with before deciding. A senior engineer who knows your context and is consistently available, without hiring a full-time role.
A technical half hour on feasibility, the integrations required, and the cheapest way to test the riskiest part.